User Tools

Site Tools


doc:appunti:linux:video:ffmpeg

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
doc:appunti:linux:video:ffmpeg [2019/11/27 10:41] – [AVC (x264) is better than ASP (xvid4)] niccolodoc:appunti:linux:video:ffmpeg [2019/11/27 10:41] – [AVC (x264) is better than ASP (xvid4)] niccolo
Line 293: Line 293:
   * **Tuning**: Use the **film** option for real life scenes.   * **Tuning**: Use the **film** option for real life scenes.
   * **Profile**: The **High** profile is OK for high-definition television (e.g. 1280×720, or Blu-ray disc), //High 10// add support for 10 bits per sample, //High 444// up to 14 bits per sample (both for [[wp>High dynamic range|HDR]] videos). Do not use //Main//, which is for standard-definition TV, e.g. 720×576.   * **Profile**: The **High** profile is OK for high-definition television (e.g. 1280×720, or Blu-ray disc), //High 10// add support for 10 bits per sample, //High 444// up to 14 bits per sample (both for [[wp>High dynamic range|HDR]] videos). Do not use //Main//, which is for standard-definition TV, e.g. 720×576.
-  * **IDC Level**: Leave this parameter to **Auto**, setting it to higer values does not increase the quality, but impose higher constraints to the decoder. I.e. to decode 1280×1024@42 it is sufficient the 3.1 IDC level (see [[wp>Advanced Video Coding]]).+  * **IDC Level**: Leave this parameter to **Auto**, setting it to higer values does not increase the video quality, but imposes higher constraints to the decoder. I.e. to decode 1280×1024@42 it is sufficient the 3.1 IDC level (see [[wp>Advanced Video Coding]]).
  
 ====== More on ffmpeg Command Line ====== ====== More on ffmpeg Command Line ======
doc/appunti/linux/video/ffmpeg.txt · Last modified: 2023/11/13 11:24 by niccolo