Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- doc:appunti:linux:video:ffmpeg [2019/11/27 10:41] – [AVC (x264) is better than ASP (xvid4)] niccolo
+++ doc:appunti:linux:video:ffmpeg [2019/11/30 18:06] – [Final rendering (re-encoding)] niccolo
@@ Line 272: / Line 272: @@
 ^ Basic x264      | Preset: **slow** (or less), Tuning: **film**, Profile: **High**, IDC Level: **Auto** |
 ^ Video encoding  | Average Bitrate (Two Pass), Average Bitrate 6000 kb/s (about 3 Gb per hour)  |
-^ Audio codec     | Lame MP3  |
+^ Audio codec     | <del>Lame MP3</del> Vorbis  |
 ^ Audio bitrate   | CBR 192 (or higher)  |
@@ Line 293: / Line 293: @@
   * **Tuning**: Use the **film** option for real life scenes.
   * **Profile**: The **High** profile is OK for high-definition television (e.g. 1280×720, or Blu-ray disc), //High 10// add support for 10 bits per sample, //High 444// up to 14 bits per sample (both for [[wp>High dynamic range|HDR]] videos). Do not use //Main//, which is for standard-definition TV, e.g. 720×576.
-  * **IDC Level**: Leave this parameter to **Auto**, setting it to higer values does not increase the quality, but impose higher constraints to the decoder. I.e. to decode 1280×1024@42 it is sufficient the 3.1 IDC level (see [[wp>Advanced Video Coding]]).
+  * **IDC Level**: Leave this parameter to **Auto**, setting it to higer values does not increase the video quality, but imposes higher constraints to the decoder. I.e. to decode 1280×1024@42 it is sufficient the 3.1 IDC level (see [[wp>Advanced Video Coding]]).
 ====== More on ffmpeg Command Line ======